What Darwin
didn't know

This is about scientific adaptations, and the next button "We and our climate" is about human and moral issues. 

#          #         # 

 

Before his retirement in 2002, Prof. Werner Gitt was director of the information technology department of the department for scientific-technical cross-sectional tasks within the Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt in Braunschweig. Here are excerpts from a lecture by Prof. Werner Gitt: "The key to life": ...

 

What is information?

 

Every language, regardless of whether it is animal or human, only works because the correct arrangement of certain sounds or characters have a fixed meaning that the sender and recipient of this information know exactly and therefore understand.

However, this does not happen by chance, but always with the use of intelligence and will. Information always follows precise grammatical rules that have been agreed in advance. But what exactly is information, how do you define it?

According to the definition of Dr. Werner Gitt is information, more precisely "universal information", when the following five levels are recognizable:

1) Statistics ... There is a set of characters

2) Syntax ... these contain a code system, i.e. a grammar,

3) Semantics ... the information has a meaning, a meaning,

4) Pragmatics ... this leads to an action or reaction on the part of the recipient

5) Apobetics ... the information has a specific goal. Definitions are of course freely selectable, but must then also be strictly adhered to.

 

We will see that our DNA has all five levels of "Universal Information" and the genetic code thus represents highly precise information:

1) Statistics: The four occurring nucleobases A, T, C, G form the system of symbols.

2) Syntax: The DNA code system stipulates that three successive nucleobases (a so-called triplet) always stand for a certain amino acid. What is remarkable here is that only a genetic grammar is implemented in all of living nature!

3) Semantics: The sequence of the triplets stored in the DNA means that the cell has to synthesize a very specific protein.

4) Pragmatics: The amino acid sequence stored in the DNA leads in the protein factory of the cell (the ribosome) with the help of mRNA and tRNA to the action of producing the correspondingly encoded protein. Only a correct sequence of hundreds and often thousands of amino acids ultimately results in the construction of a single protein molecule.

5) Apobetics: The aim of the genetic code is to create a structurally viable body in which trillions of proteins must not only be produced, but also precisely spatially arranged and networked with one another.

 

An unimaginably complex process that occurs billions of times in our body every second. All the necessary work instructions are stored in our DNA according to a precise grammar. Because of these fantastic connections, the question naturally arises: Where does the unimaginably huge amount of information in our DNA come from? Who is the programmer? Reality shows us that at the beginning of EVERY information chain there is an intelligent sender with consciousness and will. Information is a non-material quantity Without exception, all physical units in science can be derived from the seven independent base units of the International System of Units (SI): length, mass, current intensity, temperature, amount of substance, light intensity and time. There is a clear, internationally recognized physical definition for each of these seven basic units. Without exception, the so-called SI system allows all material quantities to be described using the seven basic units mentioned above. However, the quantity "information" cannot be represented with any combination of the seven basic units. "Information" is therefore a non-material quantity. Consciousness and will cannot be described by the SI system either. The materialistically oriented way of thinking of the sciences always leads to serious errors precisely when non-material quantities are treated as if they were material quantities. Even our modern computer languages only exist because they were created by humans (endowed with spirit, intelligence and will). Mass and energy form the basic quantities of the material world and are coupled with each other by the well-known Einstein formula: E = mc2. On the non-material side, two basic variables must also be named: universal information and will.

 

 

Laws of nature about information

 

Laws of nature know no exceptions, they always apply in every place, at every time, in the whole universe. Hence in science the strongest arguments are always given by the laws of nature. Like every recognized natural law, it is necessary to falsify these natural law relationships.

In other words, with just one counterexample, these connections could be refuted, which has not been possible up to now.

• At the beginning of every information chain there is an intelligent originator / sender.

• Information always has a code (grammar) determined by the author.

• There is no code without a conscious, willful agreement.

• Matter alone cannot generate information.

• Information cannot arise by chance or over long periods of time.

 

The thought system of chemical evolution or abiogenesis of life could only work if a code can develop through natural chance processes to encode information in free form. No evolutionist can avoid this basic requirement. But now we have seen that information is not a property of matter. Matter and energy are only carriers of information.

In the very interesting lecture "Origin of life from the point of view of computer science", Dr. Werner Gitt these connections very clearly.

Pollination: When insects pass on the pollen from plant flowers, this is primarily an information transfer process (of genetic information). The matter involved is irrelevant. Photosynthesis: Photosynthesis only works when the information is added on how oxygen is produced from carbon dioxide with the help of solar energy. This information is stored in every blade of grass and in every leaf on our earth, but no engineer or biologist is able to reconstruct this ingenious principle.

Life: No scientist can explain what "life" actually is. We can only name characteristics of life. The theory of evolution, however, has no conclusive explanation for how living things can arise from dead matter. The microbiologist

Louis Pasteur (1822 - 1895) recognized another important law of nature that finds confirmation everywhere: "Omne vivum ex vivo - all life comes from living things."

 

Consequences of these natural laws The natural laws about universal information have now proven themselves innumerable times in experience and could not be refuted experimentally. The basics of the "code" topic were developed by Dr. Werner Gitt already published in 1982 and they have withstood all scientific reviews to this day.

Unbiased people conclude that the doctrine of the origin of life through chance processes is simply a theoretical structure and is not possible in practice. The genetic code represents a mental idea.

And so it is only logical to ask whether life does not come from a goal-oriented creation process of a far superior intelligence. Today, the laws of nature about information provide us with the strongest argument for the origin of living beings through intelligent creation. 

 

~ ~ ~

 

from Prof. Werner Gitt

 

 

... What is information?

 

Every language, regardless of whether it is animal or human, only works because the correct arrangement of certain sounds or characters have a fixed meaning that the sender and recipient of this information know exactly and therefore understand. However, this does not happen by chance, but always with the use of intelligence and will. Information always follows precise grammatical rules that have been agreed in advance. But what exactly is information, how do you define it? According to the definition of Dr. Werner Gitt is information, more precisely "universal information", when the following five levels are recognizable:

 

1) Statistics ... There is a set of characters

 

2) Syntax ... these contain a code system, i.e. a grammar,

 

3) Semantics ... the information has a meaning, a meaning,

 

4) Pragmatics ... this leads to an action or reaction on the part of the recipient

 

5) Apobetics ... the information has a specific goal.

 

When Dr. When Werner Gitt talks about information, he always means universal information with the five levels mentioned above. Definitions are of course freely selectable, but must then also be strictly adhered to. And that is exactly what is done in the following, comparing like with like. We will see that our DNA has all five levels of "Universal Information" by definition and the genetic code thus represents highly precise information:

1) Statistics: The four occurring nucleobases A, T, C, G form the symbol system.

2) Syntax: The DNA code system stipulates that three successive nucleobases (a so-called triplet) always stand for a certain amino acid. For example, the triplet GGA in the code system of genetic language stands for the glycine molecule. By the way, it is extremely remarkable that only a genetic grammar is realized in all of living nature!

3) Semantics: The sequence of the triplets stored in the DNA means that the cell has to synthesize a very specific protein.

4) Pragmatics: The amino acid sequence stored in the DNA leads in the protein factory of the cell (the ribosome) with the help of mRNA and tRNA to the action of producing the correspondingly encoded protein. Only a correct sequence of hundreds and often thousands of amino acids ultimately results in the construction of a single protein molecule.

5) Apobetics: The aim of the genetic code is to create a structurally viable body in which trillions of proteins must not only be produced, but also precisely spatially arranged and networked with one another.

An unimaginably complex process that occurs billions of times in our body every second. All the necessary work instructions are stored in our DNA according to a precise grammar. Absolutely nothing happens here by chance, everything is precisely programmed. Because of these fantastic relationships, the question naturally arises:

Where does the unimaginably huge amount of information in our DNA come from? Who is the programmer? In evolutionary studies, however, it is consistently assumed that information can arise by itself within matter. But nobody has ever been able to observe or prove such a process. And that will not be possible in the future either, because reality shows us that at the beginning of EVERY information chain there is an intelligent transmitter with consciousness and will.

 

Information is a non-material quantity

Without exception, all physical units in science can be derived from the seven independent base units of the International System of Units (SI):

length,

mass,

current intensity,

temperature,

amount of substance,

light intensity and

time.

 

There is a clear, internationally recognized physical definition for each of these seven basic units. All units known to us and all currently unknown units that relate to the material world can be derived from these basic units. Without exception, the so-called SI system allows all material quantities to be described using the seven basic units mentioned above. However, the quantity "information" cannot be represented with any combination of the seven basic units. This clearly demonstrates that "information" is a non-material quantity. Since other quantities, such as consciousness and will, cannot be described by the SI system either, these also clearly belong to the non-material quantities.

The materialistically oriented way of thinking of the sciences always leads to serious errors precisely when non-material quantities are treated as if they were material quantities. This simple fact alone should make one think, as one can scientifically call a theory about the origin of life, if the natural prerequisites this afor are not given at all. Our modern computer languages only exist because they were created by humans (endowed with mind, intelligence and will). All conceivable examples prove again and again that there is a creative spirit at the beginning of every information chain.

 

Mass and energy form the basic quantities of the material world and are coupled with one another by the well-known Einstein formula: E = mc2. On the non-material side, two basic variables are also to be named: Universal information and will, which are closely linked to one another.
Laws of nature about information Laws of nature know no exceptions, they always apply in every place, at every time, in the whole universe. Hence in science the strongest arguments are always given by the laws of nature. From the above-mentioned regularities, further, repeatedly confirmed and therefore natural-law relationships can be derived through logical inference. Like every recognized law of nature, this now has to be falsified. In other words, with just one counterexample, these relationships could be refuted, which has not been possible up to now.
• At the beginning of every information chain there is an intelligent originator / sender. • Information always has a code (grammar) determined by the author.
• There is no code without a conscious, willful agreement.
• Matter alone cannot generate information.
• Information cannot arise by chance or over long periods of time.
The thought system of chemical evolution or abiogenesis of life could only work if a code can develop through natural chance processes to encode information in free form. No evolutionist can avoid this basic requirement. But now we have seen that information is not a property of matter. Matter and energy are only carriers of information. Anyone who nevertheless claims matter alone could produce a code that is suitable for encrypting information in free form must provide the necessary example.
In the highly interesting lecture "Origin of life from the point of view of computer science", Dr. Werner Gitt these connections very clearly. Before his retirement in 2002 he was director of the information technology department of the department for scientific-technical cross-sectional tasks within the Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt in Braunschweig. Pollination: When insects transmit the pollen from plant flowers, it is primarily an information transfer process (of genetic information). The matter involved is irrelevant. Photosynthesis: The chemical equation of photosynthesis, which can be found in every textbook, has one major flaw: it doesn't work! Because the chemical substances involved are left to their own devices, they organize absolutely nothing, no matter how great the solar radiation is.
Photosynthesis only works when information is added on how oxygen is produced from carbon dioxide with the help of solar energy. This information is stored in every blade of grass and in every leaf on our earth, but no engineer or biologist is able to reconstruct this ingenious principle. Life:                            No scientist can explain what "life" actually is. We can only name characteristics of life. The theory of evolution, however, has no conclusive explanation for how living things can arise from dead matter. The microbiologist Louis Pasteur (1822 - 1895) recognized another important law of nature that finds confirmation everywhere: "Omne vivum ex vivo - all life comes from living things."
Consequences of these natural laws The natural laws about universal information have now proven themselves innumerable times in experience and could not be refuted experimentally. The basics of the topic "code" were given by Dr. Werner Gitt already published in 1982 and they have withstood all scientific reviews to this day. Experience has shown that the presence of a code always indicates a previous intellectual process. We already need intelligence on the second level of information.
Unbiased people will be able to conclude from this that the doctrine of the origin of life through chance processes is simply a theoretical structure and is not possible in practice. The genetic code represents a mental idea. And so it is only logical to ask whether life does not come from a goal-oriented creation process of a far superior intelligence. This would explain the essential, spiritual source of biological information from the point of view of computer science. The theory of evolution, on the other hand, as already said, assumes that the information encoded in DNA does not require a programmer. Today the laws of nature about information give us the strongest argument for the origin of living beings through intelligent creation.

I would like to continue paying tribute to Prof. Werner Gitt's groundbreaking findings:

 

Information - the key to life

 

In order to refute the theory of the origin of life through evolution, it is pointless to merely present arguments against various inconsistencies. If, however, a law of nature undermines the evolutionary thought system at the root, all further, arduous pro / contra discussions are superfluous. Because laws of nature know no exceptions, they always apply, in every place, at every time, in the whole universe. Therefore in science the strongest argumentation is always given by the laws of nature. For example, everyone knows today that a perpetual motion machine, i.e. a machine that runs continuously without a supply of energy, is an impossible machine because the law of conservation of energy simply forbids it.

According to exactly the same principle, the laws of nature about information preclude the emergence of life through natural processes from the outset. Coded information cannot arise independently. Information is a spiritual, immaterial quantity and ALWAYS comes from an intelligent transmitter. What does that mean? Today we know what Darwin could not have known. There is an unimaginable amount of coded information in the cells of all living things. The formation of all organs is information-controlled, thousands of regulated and precisely linked processes in each individual cell are just as information-controlled as the production of all endogenous substances (50,000 different proteins in the human body alone).

Every work instruction required for this is stored in the DNA of our cells and that in the highest storage density known. However, a code system is always the result of an intellectual process and requires a spiritual author. All experience shows that matter by itself is not able to generate a code in order to encrypt information in free form. Only a creative mind with free will, intelligence and creative planning can do that.

The materialistically oriented way of thinking in the sciences therefore always leads to serious errors precisely when non-material quantities are treated as if they were material quantities. This simple fact alone should give food for thought, as one can scientifically call a theory about the origin of life, if the natural basic requirements for it are not given at all. Our modern computer languages only exist because they were created by humans (endowed with mind, intelligence and will). Nowhere has a computer language or a computer program developed on its own purely on the basis of natural necessities. All conceivable examples prove again and again that there is a creative spirit at the beginning of every information chain.

The theory of evolution, on the other hand, still assumes that the genetic code came about by itself through natural necessity. An extremely implausible concept that is nowhere confirmed. Mass and energy form the basic quantities of the material world and are coupled with one another by the well-known Einstein formula: E = mc2. On the non-material side, two basic variables are also to be named: Universal information and will, which are closely linked to one another.

Laws of nature about information Laws of nature know no exceptions, they always apply in every place, at every time, in the whole universe. Hence in science the strongest arguments are always given by the laws of nature. From the above-mentioned regularities, further, repeatedly confirmed and therefore natural-law relationships can be derived through logical inference.

Like every recognized law of nature, this now has to be falsified. That means, with only one counterexample, the connections are refuted and it would only have been apparent laws of nature. But if no counterexample can be found, the laws harden from time to time.

• At the beginning of every information chain there is an intelligent originator / sender.

• Information always has a code (grammar) determined by the author.

• There is no code without a conscious, willful agreement.

• Matter alone cannot generate information.

• Information cannot arise by chance or over long periods of time.

 

The thought system of chemical evolution or abiogenesis of life could only work if a code can develop through natural chance processes to encode information in free form. No evolutionist can avoid this basic requirement. But now we have seen that information is not a property of matter. Matter and energy are only carriers of information. Who nevertheless claims matter alone can if a code is to be produced that is suitable for freely encrypting information, it must provide the necessary example.

In the highly interesting lecture "Origin of life from the point of view of computer science", Dr. Werner Gitt once again very vividly presented these relationships. Pollination: When insects transmit the pollen from plant flowers, it is primarily an information transfer process (of genetic information). The matter involved is irrelevant. Photosynthesis:

The chemical equation of photosynthesis, which can be found in every textbook, has one major flaw: it doesn't work! Because the chemical substances involved are left to their own devices, they organize absolutely nothing, no matter how great the solar radiation is.

Photosynthesis only works when information is added on how oxygen is produced from carbon dioxide with the help of solar energy. This information is stored in every blade of grass and in every leaf on our earth, but no engineer or biologist is able to reconstruct this ingenious principle.

 

 Life:

No scientist can explain what "life" actually is. We can only name characteristics of life. The theory of evolution, however, has no conclusive explanation for how living things can arise from dead matter. The microbiologist Louis Pasteur (1822 - 1895) recognized another important law of nature that finds confirmation everywhere: "Omne vivum ex vivo - all life comes from living things."

All ideologies (e.g. materialism) and all thought structures (e.g. evolution theory) that simply ignore significant natural laws will automatically always come to wrong conclusions. Yes, they really shouldn't even be called scientific! Consequences of these natural laws The natural laws about universal information have now proven themselves innumerable times in experience and could not be refuted experimentally.

The basics of the topic "code" were given by Dr. Werner Gitt already published in 1982 and they have withstood all scientific reviews to this day. Experience has shown that the presence of a code always indicates a previous intellectual process. We already need intelligence on the second level of information. Every reader of this text who would like to check it in everyday life will also have to confirm again and again that coded information needs a transmitter.

Unprejudiced people will quickly be able to conclude from this that the doctrine of the origin of life through chance processes is simply a theoretical structure and is not possible in practice. These connections therefore only allow one logical conclusion:

The genetic code represents a mental idea. And so it is only logical to ask whether life does not come from a goal-oriented creation process of a far superior intelligence. This would explain the essential, spiritual source of biological information from the point of view of computer science. The theory of evolution, on the other hand, as already said, assumes that the information encoded in DNA does not require a programmer.

However, this statement is abundantly refuted by daily experience with the above regularities. For this reason, the laws of nature about information provide us with the strongest argument for the origin of living beings through intelligent creation. The above-mentioned laws of nature about universal information thus hit the Achilles' heel of the theory of evolution and expose its scientific exposure. Or to put it another way:

Anyone who thinks that the development of life through evolving random processes is possible believes in a "perpetual motion machine of information".

 

#   #   #   #

 

I would like to continue here with:

 

"How science came about and what became of it"

From Prof. Wolfgang Leisenberg:

 

"If, despite these overwhelming facts, evolutionists cannot be convinced, it shows how strongly a deeply rooted, dangerous creed of atheism goes hand in hand with this system of thought.

Why? Godless people do not accept a worldview that needs a creator, they do not want to admit it, that someone is above them to whom they have to give an account of their entire life. That is why atheists must absolutely and with all their might hold on to this idea, even if it poses almost insurmountable problems ".

In "Did God Create Through Evolution?" writes Dr. Werner Gitt:

"It is noticeable that the results of the theory of evolution, which are presented as fundamental, do not represent the conclusions from measurements and observations, but describe the system of prerequisites. In the context of the original models, only those theories that fit into the evolutionary concept are allowed. But this is not a scientific, but an ideological attitude. In this way, an ideology of materialism is smuggled into science almost unnoticed."

Let's read an interesting statement by an eminent scientist about this: Richard C. Lewontin - geneticist and former professor of biology at Harvard University:

"It is not that the methods of science force us to accept a purely material explanation of the visible world. No, on the contrary, first we decided on pure Believing material processes and then we created research methods and theories of science that produce purely material explanations - no matter how much these explanations contradict common sense, no matter how confusing they seem to the uninitiated ".

The impossibility of macroevolution There is indeed an evolution that actually takes place, i.e. a further development, but within a biological species. These are mostly adaptations to changed environmental or living conditions. This process is known as microevolution. That was also what Darwin once observed on his travels. He also created the term macroevolution. In other words, the emergence of a new biological species from an existing one, which is said to have led to the higher development and differentiation of all species. However, one speaks of a common biological species only if a male can produce procreative offspring with a female.

 

Chemical evolution or abiogenesis:

This is a fundamentally important process for the creation of the very first molecules of life, and for the creation of life itself, from inanimate matter in the so-called primordial soup. All three of the above terms are regrettably summarized in common usage under the collective term "evolution" and no further distinction is made in discussions. It is precisely this inaccuracy that explains why discussions on the topic are often so fruitless.

Axel Jungbluth writes: "We know microevolutive processes from the breeding of animals and plants and can understand them very well experimentally. Microevolution through recombination and selection processes is well documented, so that today nobody has any doubts about it. There is no scientific evidence for macroevolution , yes there are even many reasons that speak against it.

 

Is Chemical Evolution Possible?

The answer in advance: No! Although chemical evolution is the only available and serious scientific explanation of the origin of life, this theory was already refuted by the experimental attempts of the macrochemist Dr. Bruno Vollmert at the Technical University of Karlsruhe. He showed that the presence of water is an insoluble problem in the interlinking of the basic building blocks of life. Because after just a few links, water leads to the chain breaking of the resulting amino acid compounds."

In fact, you could only [...] always obtain amino acids, but not even the simplest protein molecules. The information that is now transmitted by DNA and RNA was also missing."

 

This means that the necessary chaining of the basic building blocks to protein molecules can never happen spontaneously without a blueprint, but prevents itself under natural conditions. If “chemical evolution” were not one of the core questions of the naturalistic principle, it would probably already be Long since disappeared from textbooks. "Even after more than 60 years of intensive research, the basic model of chemical evolution has not been scientifically proven. Missing fossil transitional forms Another very big problem are the so-called "missing links", i.e. the lack of basically all important fossil transitional forms between the species.

We are thus in the area of macroevolution, i.e. the supposedly continuous higher development and the emergence of new species. There is no reliable evidence for this hypothetical process either. If Darwin's predicted process of the higher development of the species is correct, however, innumerable fossil intermediate stages should be recognizable in the geological layers. The fossil record of Darwin's time spoke against it and Charles Darwin criticized himself that: "... since geology undoubtedly does not reveal such finely graded organic changes and this is perhaps the most obvious and serious objection that has been raised against my theory of evolution can. "

In order for the theory of the higher evolution of species to be held, Darwin argued that enough fossils would be found in the next few decades to substantiate his theory. Today, over 150 years and tens of thousands of fossil finds later, the picture is clear and sober.

 

Most species show no directional changes during their existence on earth. From their appearance in the fossil record, they look almost exactly the same as when they disappeared. Rather, it appears suddenly and as a fully developed species. Stephen Jay Gould - paleontologist, geologist, evolutionary researcher at Harvard University: "The fossil tradition with its abrupt changes cannot provide support for a gradual change. [...] All paleontologists are aware that the fossil tradition has precious little in between contains; and [...] What could imperfect initial stages of useful structures be used for? What to do with half a wing? All species appear suddenly and fully developed.

 

Source: Prof. Dr. Werner Gitt - Is the theory of evolution a substitute religion? 

 

 ~ ~ ~ ~ 

 

At least, with a lecture out: www.was-darwin-nicht-wusste.de:

 

 Mathematical surprises in nature

 

 

The "golden number" has umpteen unique properties like no other number and so it is not surprising that it plays an important role in creation.

But first a few mathematical basics: The golden number has an infinite number of decimal places and is denoted by the Greek letter Φ (Phi). It starts with 1.618033.

Phi is the number of the golden angle Psi. Dividing the full circle of 360 ° according to the ratio of the golden section results in the so-called golden angle Ψ (Psi) of 137.5 °.

Phi is the number of the golden spiral. If you add another identical square (1) to a square (1), so that the total distance of the outer edges now serves as the basis for a new square (2), the result is a rectangle ... Phi and the Fibonacci numbers.

Anyone can easily create the Fibonacci sequence themselves: It starts with the number one and each additional number is the sum of the two preceding numbers: 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89, 144, 233, 377, 610, 987, 1597, etc.

But what role do these number games now have in animate nature? blossoms The number of petals on most plants is a Fibonacci number (3, 5, or 8). In creation, however, we also find a great many flowers that are constructed according to the pattern of the regular pentagon.

This means that the golden ratio occurs in all flowers with this unique number Φ and very precisely. But how does the plant know? All of this information is stored in the genome, i.e. in the DNA molecules. This microscopic material contains the entire geometry of the flower in the highest storage density known to us.

  

 

The golden spiral

It is noticeable that the golden spiral is very common in creation. The snail-shaped limestone shell of the Nautilus has approximately the slope of the golden spiral. In addition, this spiral is spatial. This golden spiral can be found everywhere: for example in snails, ferns, the human ear, in hurricanes and even in galaxies.

So we see that the Creator constructs on the principle of the golden spiral.

 

 

The sunflower

The distribution of the kernels in the sunflower basket is not random, but mathematically precisely offset by 137.5 ° each. As read above, this is exactly the number of degrees of the golden angle, which also goes back to the beautiful number of the golden section (1.618033 ...).

That this 137.5 ° angle is really the best offset angle for the number of sunflower seeds in the basket.

A deviation of only 1 ° would be a disaster for sunflowers. The golden ratio is programmed into absolutely every sunflower seed and they pass this number on from generation to generation. This principle does not only apply to sunflowers, but also to daisies, pine cones, romanesco, honeycombs, pineapples ... Everywhere we find left- and right-handed spirals.

In conclusion, one recognizes that everything is constructed down to the finest detail, nothing is accidental. There is nothing that just happened that way, everything is mathematically precisely planned.

Seen in this way, with all the miracles in creation, an atheist needs a much greater belief in the principle of chance than someone who believes in intelligent planning.

 

~    ~    ~

 ~   ~   ~   ~

 

In 2015 Pope Francis wrote in the Encyclical Laudato si´ (St. Benno-Verlag) among other things:

 

The export of some raw materials to satisfy the markets in the industrialized north has caused local damage, such as mercury poisoning in gold mines or poisoning with sulfur dioxide in mining for copper production.

In particular, it is important to bear in mind that the environmental sector of the entire planet is being used to “dispose of” the gaseous waste that has accumulated over two centuries, creating a situation that is now affecting all countries of the world. The warming caused by the enormous consumption of some rich countries is particularly devastating in the poorest areas of the world, where the rise in temperatur e combined with the drought is causing crop yields to decline ...

We find that it is often multinational companie s that operate there so act and do what they are not allowed to do in the developed countries or in the so-called First World. In general, when they cease to operate and withdraw, they leave great damage and debts to people and the environment such as unemployment, lifeless villages, depletion of some natural reserves, deforestation, impoverishment of local agriculture and ranching, craters, polluted rivers

and a few social works that can no longer be maintained ...

The foreign indebtedness of poor countries has become a control instrument, but the same cannot be said of ecological debt ... 

and; "The technocratic paradigm also tends to dominate the economy and politics. The economy adopts any technological development in terms of yield without paying attention to possible negative effects on people. Finances are suffocating the real economy. ...

Man thinks that the problems of hunger and misery in the world, together with all environmental problems, will dissolve with the growth of the market.

However, the market by itself does not guarantee the holistic development of people and social inclusion. ...

 

However, it is possible, Human freedom is able to restrict technology, to direct it and to put it at the service of a different kind of progress, which is healthier, more humane, more social and more holistic than that under the technocratic paradigm ...

Nobody asks to go back to the times of the cavemen, but it is essential to take a lower gear to get the real deal To look at reality in a different way, to collect the positive and sustainable progress and at the same time to regain the values and the great goals that have been destroyed by an unrestrained megalomania. "

 

 

+   +   +

 

# I ask all those who want NO more to be informed of activities of TubeWay solar to send an e-mail with the subject "unsubscribe". 

  - - - - - - - - 

Falls Sie NICHT mehr über Aktivitäten von TubeWaySolar informiert werden wollen, um eine e-Mail mit dem Betreff "unsubscribe".

  - - - - - - - -     

Kontakt

e-mail:  

thalhammerm@yahoo.de

  

Skype: michael.th3

 

Tel. +43(1)9195724,  Austria